I often say, “I am probably the least interested in technology, technology professional you might ever meet”. The reasons for this are simple — use!
I readily, recognize the benefit that good technology provides in theory. However, I also know firsthand how much of technology often gets used. Cell phones are wonderful, in theory but mostly serve to be a nuisance in most of our lives – whether we realize this or not.
The primary motivation behind the development of most technology, has traditionally been about making lives better. Methods of farming, cooking, … living were all improved upon over time in order that these activities would be easier and subsequently that the quality of life would be improved. What we have seen over time however, is the exploitation of development and innovation, [itself] so that greater emphasis was given to aiming more of these efforts in specific ways of bettering many negative aspects of human activity. So along with developing technology to send men to the moon … were efforts to develop technologies for making war, on a scale great enough to wipe out all of mankind … and the moon.
As time progresses, we see greater efforts being made to channel these innovative energies in more-&-more commercial directions – to the degree that “development” itself has all but become a commercial endeavor. We live in an era when unbelievable resources and talents are being allocated solely, for the creation and marketing of ringtones; and consumers actually buy them. A concept that should only exist in a Frank Zappa song.

Zappa Would Have Loved Ringtones
The cell phones that possess basic foundational usefulness are being marketed with features most of us have no need for and will very likely never even use. Most upgrades of cell phones are made for cosmetic purposes rather than feature necessity. Less-&-less focus seems to be being given to innovation that might genuinely improve life, for all things living … than innovation to please or even placate much of humanity. When I was a child, it was common to hear talk of cures, in regards to goals for medical research. Today, we virtually only hear of treatments being advanced. It may be cynicism on my part but I can’t help but imagine that much of the reason for this shift in research focus is being driven by the fact that there is little money to be made in finding a cure – but untold billions to be made in developing treatments. Cures are a onetime purchase … treatments, may be for life.

Since, 1966 the Jerry Lewis MDA telethon alone has raised almost 2 billion dollars towards muscular dystrophy research. This doesn’t include all other avenues of funding, grants, donations and charitable contributions given to aid research, in this field of study. I am unaware of any significant progress that has been made in this area, in those 44 years. I am not implying that the money has not been used wisely … I am simply, saying a mountain of wealth has been poured into this one area alone, for decades and greater advances have been made in helping men achieve erections than finding a cure for muscular dystrophy. So much so that, multiple competing companies have released different treatments for erectile dysfunction, at virtually the same time … where no significant muscular dystrophy advances have been announced in my lifetime. Total funding for cancer research has to be many times that of MD and yet, the same basic state of affairs exist. There are many different types of cancer and yet, there are still no solid medical solutions. Only, variations of treatments that have been used for decades that still often only offer some measure of hope, at best.
Technology advances [literally] daily; frequently pushing many media devices to deliver audio and video signal with clarity beyond the ability for the human eye and ear to detect. Product specifications are often only comparable on a chart, as we may lack the ability to detect the differences with our senses. Yet, focus remains in these areas, for advancement because there is money to be made. These technologies get created, updated, and “improved” even though we have little or no need (or ability to even discern without a specification sheet) for the marketed improvements.
My cell phone has a keyboard and camera that I have no real use for. It has the capability of playing various types of video and audio media … that I have no need for. In fact, I have no real need for most of the features and functions of my cell phone. But I will be notified via commercial, advertisements, and even messages sent to my cell phone by the service provider servicing my cell phone about “upgrade” possibilities for new cell phones, as they are available for purchase.
We don’t need whole industries for the creation and marketing of ringtones. We need a cure for cancer. We don’t need televisions that will fill my entire wall, as opposed to only half of it. We need a cure for muscular dystrophy. We need cures for allergies. We need cures for AIDS/HIV and the Herpes virus. Aspirins are great in lieu of a cure for the headache. But we need to keep our focus on finding solutions, instead of creating band aids. I can live with slower advances made in DVD technology. I can live with a media player that only holds 10,000 songs. I would wholly appreciate a greater focus on finding a cure for the common cold than finding a way to incorporate a method for remotely starting my car with my cell phone.
With that last sentence … someone just thought to themselves … “wouldn’t it be great if I could do that with my cell phone”.